Cultural Identity in Contemporary Turkish Architecture Case Study in Konya

Fatih Canan, Selçuk Sayın, Mustafa Korumaz

Abstract


Today in many countries, new solutions and trends in architecture field to express cultural identity against the pressure of internationalism appear in different qualitative values. In the example of Turkey, even today, if the problem of the identity affirmation in architecture continues, in fact, the historical origin of this problem coincides with the last period of the Ottoman Empire and early Republican period. Since the 20s to today, we can see the efforts to reflect national and modern identity in architectural designs, especially in public buildings.. In this study, firstly, the relationship between architecture and identity will be examined. Then after, buildings reflecting identity trends designed by famous architects such as Sedat Hakkı Eldem and Turgut Cansever from different periods in Turkey will be presented. The current architectural achievements in the generality of our country will be reviewed by a critical perspective. The city of Konya will be chosen for the special study areas. These buildings are banks, administrative and culture buildings. Trend analysis of identities in the current architectural achievements will be realized taking into account the following criteria: the metaphor, interpretation - synthesis and direct imitation. The architectural elements belonging to the Seljuk Empire that Konya was the capital between 11 th and 13 th century, will be frequently present in the selected samples. In conclusion, the defended ideas will be the following: New products of art and architecture should always be designed with an original and innovative approach. The use of direct imitation in new architectural achievements to establishing a link with the past does not always positive effect on architectural quality. The historic architectural elements used in order to create an identity in modern architecture should be interpreted with caution.


Keywords


Cultural identity, historic architectural elements, modern architecture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aksu Ö., 2007, “Yerel Kültür ve Mimarlık İlişkisi: Cengiz Bektaş Örneği- Local Culture and Corelatıon with Architecture Case Study: Cengiz Bektaş”, Master thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.

Balamir A., 2003, “ Mimari Kimlik Temrinleri 1: Türkiye’de Modern Yapı Kültürünün Bir profili – Architecture and Exercise of Identity 1: A Profile of Building Culture in Modern Turkey” Mimarlık Dergisi No. 313, p. 24-29, İstanbul

Balamir- 2 A., 2003, “ Mimari Kimlik Temrinleri 2: Türkiye’de Modern Yapı Kültürünün Bir profili – Architecture and Exercise of Identity2: A Profile of Building Culture in Modern Turkey” Mimarlık Dergisi No. 314,.., İstanbul

Dönmez E., 2006, “ Türkiye’deki Kültürel Kimliğin Mimariye Etkisi- The Effect of Cultural Identity in Turkey on Architecture”, Master thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara.

İnceoğlu M. And N., 2004, ”Mimarlıkta Söylem – Kuram ve Uygulama”, Tasarım Yayın Grubu, İstanbul.

Özkan S., 1992,” Régionalisme et Mouvement Moderne, à La Recherche d’Une Architecture Contemporaine en Harmonie avec La Culture - Regionalism and the Modern Movement, a Research of a contemporary architecture in harmony with Culture”, Architecture and Behaviour, Vol.8, No.4, P. 353-366, EPFL, Lausanne

Özkul O., 2005, “Kültür ve küreselleşme, Kültür Sosyolojisine Giriş- Culture and globalization, Introduction to Sociology of Culture”, Açılım Kitap Evi, İstanbul

Sözen M. ,1984,” Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türk Mimarlığı- Turkish Architecture in Republican period ”, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, Ankara

Tanyeli, U., 2001, “Sedat Hakkı Eldem”, Boyut Yayın Grubu, İstanbul

Tay W., 1995, “Ideology, Identity, and Architecture: Modernism, Postmodernism, and Antiquarianism in Taiwan.”, The Humanities Bulletin vol.4, Honk Kong.

Vanlı Ş., 2007, “Daha İyisi Yapılamaz Saplantısı: Tarihte Kültürel Ortaklık ve Taklit Üzerine Düşünceler- the obsession that it cannot do better: Reflections on the Cultural Partnership and Imitation in history”, Mimarlık Dergisi, No.333, P.33-36, İstanbul


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Fatih Canan, Selçuk Sayın, Mustafa Korumaz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                                                                                    
                                                                                     INDEXES & DATABASES:
                                                                                                      
 
                  
                 
                
 
                   
 

                                                
                            ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by Selcuk University, ©2017,