A Novel Discussion on Urban Planning Practice: Citizen Participation

Ebru Kamacı

Abstract


In the age of modern democracy, citizen participation process, including all types, is assumed as a major feature of policy, decision-making and urban planning fields. Commonly, the process of participation is considered as fundamental to the involvement of citizens in decision-making process in contemporary planning milieu. Since the late 1950s, the role of participation in urban planning practices has become larger and expanding; and after the communicative turn in urban planning theory it is now one of the influential topics of planning agenda. Because participatory processes have become popular and widely used in planning practices from local to national levels; achieving a comprehensible understanding of the theory, objectives, history, of citizen participation process in planning have become vigorous for planners of today. Located within the context described above, the basic concern of this paper is to expand our awareness about the changing meaning, role and positions, of citizen participation in urban planning.

Keywords


Citizen Participation; Participatory Planning Approaches; Community Action Plan

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfasi, N. (2003). Is Public Participation Making Urban Planning More Democratic? The Israeli Experience, Planning Theory and Practice, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, pp.185-202. Doi:10.1080/14649350307979

Augur, T.B. (1945). Citizen Participation in City Planning, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 242, pp. 101-103

Arnstein, S.R. (1969). The Ladder of Participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, Issue.4, pp.216-224. Doi: 10.1080/01944366908977225

Beaudoux, E. Crombrugghe, G. Douxchamps, F, Geuneau, M and Nieuwkerk. M., (1992). Supporting Development Action from Identification to Evaluation, London: Macmillan Press.

Burby, J.L. (2003). Making plans that matter: Citizen Involvement and government action. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, pp. 33–49.Doi: 10.1177/0739456X03022004007

Burke, E. M. (1968). Citizen Participation Strategies. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 34, Issue. 5, pp. 287 - 294.

Brabham, D.C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects, Planning Theory, Vo.8. Issue. 3. pp. 242–262. Doi: 10.1177/1473095209104824

Brody, S. D. (2003). Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management, Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, pp. 407–19. Doi: 10.1177/0739456X03022004007

Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D.R. and Burby, R. J. (2003). Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making: Six Strategic Planning Choices, Journal of American Planning Association, Vol.69, Issue.3, pp. 245-269. Doi: 10.1080/01944360308978018

Cohen, J and Uphoff, N. (1980). Participation’s place in rural development: seeking clarity through specificity, World Development, Vol. 8, pp.13– 235. Doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(80)90011-X

Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: models, meanings and practices, Community Development Journal, Vol. 43 No. 3.pp. 269–28. Doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsn010

Craig, G. (1998). Community Development in a Global Context, Community Development Journal, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, pp. 2-17. Doi: 10.1093/cdj/33.1.2

Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 31, pp. 331-338

Deshler, D. and Sock, D. (1985). Community development participation: a concept review of the international literature, International League for Social Commitment in Adult Education, Sweden, 22-26 July.

Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 11, Issue.3, pp. 421-434.

Fainstein. S. (2005). Planning Theory and the City, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 25: pp.121-130.Doi: 10.1177/0739456X05279275

Faludi, A. (1973). A Reader in Planning History. Pergamon Press: Oxford

Forester, J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning process, MIT Press.

Forester, J. (2006). Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 72, Issue. 4, pp. 447-456. Doi: 10.1080/01944360608976765

Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: a theory of transactive planning, Doubleday Anchor, New York

Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action, Princeton University Press, Princeton

Glass, J. J. (1979). Citizen Participation in Planning: The Relationship between Objectives and Techniques, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, pp. 180-189. Doi: 10.1080/01944367908976956

Habermas. J. (1987). The theory of communicative action II. Life-world and the system, Beacon Press, Boston.

Hall, P. (1983). The Anglo-American connection: rival rationalities in planning theory and practice, 1955-1980, Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, Vol. 10, Issue.1, pp. 41-46. Doi: 10.1068/b100041

Hall, P. (1992). Urban and regional planning, Routledge, London.

Hamdi, N. and Goethert, R. (1997). Action planning for cities: A Guide to Community Practice, Academy Press

Healey, P. (1993). The communicative work of development plans, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, pp. 83 – 104. Doi: 10.1068/b200083

Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, London: Macmillan

Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 30, Issue.9, pp. 1531-1546. Doi: 10.1068/a301531

Hiller, J. (2003). Agonizing over consensus: why Habermasian ideals can not be "real". Planning Theory, Vol.1, Issue.2, pp. 37-59.

Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.62, Issue.4, pp.460-472.

Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning, American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association; winter, Vol. 64, Issue.1, pp. 52-63.

Irvin, R.A and Staybury, J (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, Vol. 64, Issue. 1, pp. 55-65.

Jack, H. N. and Englewood. C. (1987). Participation, Prentice Hall PTR

Kaufman, J. L and Jacobs, H. M. (1987). A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol.53. Issue.1, pp.23-33. .Doi: 10.1080/01944368708976632

Kiernan, M. J. (1983). Ideology, politics, and planning: reflections on the theory and practice of urban planning, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 10, Issue. 1, pp. 71-87. Doi: 10.1068/b100071

Kweit, M. G. and Kweit, R. W. (1981). Implementing Public Participation in a Bureaucratic Society, Newyork: Praeger.

Lane, M. B. 2005. Public Participation in Planning: an intellectual history, Australian Geographer, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 283-299. Doi: 10.1080/00049180500325694

Mahjabeen, Z., Shrestha, K. K. and Dee, J. A. (2009). Rethinking community participation in urban planning: The role of disadvantaged groups in Sydney metropolitan strategy, Australian Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 45-63.

Maier, K. (2001). Citizen Participation in Planning: Climbing a Ladder?, European Planning Studies, Vol. 9, Issue. 6, pp. 707-719. Doi: 10.1080/713666506

Margerum, R. D. (2002). Collaborative planning: overcoming obstacles during consensus building. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, pp 237-253. Doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100302

Michels, A. (2006). Citizen participation and democracy in the Netherlands, Democratization, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, pp. 323-339. Doi: 10.1080/13510340500524067

Oakley, P. (1991). Projects with People: the practice of participation in rural development, International Labour Office, Geneva.

Pateman, C. (1976). Participation and Democratic theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Prashar, S., Shaw, R. and Takeuchi, Y. (2013). Community action planning in East Delhi: a participatory approach to build urban disaster resilience, Mitigation Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol.18, pp. 429–448. Doi: 10.1007/s11027-012-9368-4

Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture, World Development, Vol. 23, Issue. 8, pp. 1247-1263. Doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F

Randolph, J. J. (2003). Meta-Analysis of the Research on Response Cards Effects on Test Achievement, Quiz Achievement, Participation, and Off-Task Behavior, Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, pp. 113-128. Doi: 10.1177/10983007070090020201

Ribot, J. C. (2003). Democratic decentralisation of natural resources: institutionalising popular inclusion. In 'Forests, Source of Life', the XII World Forestry Congress, Quebec. City, Canada. Available at: http://pdf.wri.org/ddnr_full_revised.pdf

Rudqvist, A. and Woodford-Berger, P. (1996). Evaluation and Participation: Some Lessons’, Department for Evaluation and Internal Audit, DAC Expert Group on Aid Evaluation, Stockholm.

Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards Cosmopolis. London: John Wiley and Sons.

Sanoff, P. (2000). Community participation methods in design and planning, Canada: John Wiley and Sons.

Shrestha, K.K and McManus, P. (2008). The politics of community participation in natural resource management: lessons from community forestry in Nepal. Australian Forestry, Vol. 71, Issue.2, pp.135-146. Doi: 10.1080/00049158.2008.10676280

Silverman, R.M., Taylor, H.L. and Crawford, C. (2008). The role of citizen participation and action research principles in Main Street revitalization: An analysis of a local planning project, Action Research, Vol.6, Issue.1, pp.69-93. Doi: 10.1177/1476750307083725

World Bank. (1990). The World Bank Participation Sourcebook, World Bank, Washington.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2014 Ebru Kamacı

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                                                                                    
                                                                                     INDEXES & DATABASES:
                                                                                                      
 
                  
                 
                
 
                   
 

                                                
                            ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by Selcuk University, ©2017,