Persistence, inertia, adaptation and life cycle: applying urban morphological ideas to conceptualise sustainable city-centre change

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320//ICONARP.2019.78

Keywords:

Urban form, sustainability, rate of urban change, reconstruction, Birmingham

Abstract

Consideration of the speed and scale of change of urban forms has a long history in urban morphological thought. Buildings and forms that persist in the urban landscape through inertia or, more positively, deliberate decisions to retain them create character and – a more recent argument – contribute to sustainability not least in their embedded energy. This paper explores issues of the persistence and adaptation of some urban forms, focusing on the central business district of Birmingham, UK. Much of this is now protected as a conservation area, and some of its forms have persisted for centuries.  Yet there have been periods of rapid change, and we examine the extent of change following Second World War bomb damage. This allows discussion of the dynamics of change and the agents and agencies responsible for producing new urban forms or retaining existing ones; and this informs exploration of the potential contribution of longevity of form to sustainability. The rapid recycling of some structures, after only a couple of decades,  may be very unsustainable – impracticable and unaffordable – in an urban context.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Peter Larkham, Professor of Planning, Birmingham City University, UK.

Peter Larkham gained degrees in geography from the Universities of Manchester and Birmingham, where he studied with J.W.R. Whitehand, before moving to teach town planning at Birmingham City University. He has recently taken the role of Editor of Urban Morphology.

David Adams, Lecturer in Planning, University of Birmingham, UK.

David Adams studied at geography at Loughborough and planning at Birmingham City University.  He taught planning at Birmingham City University before moving to the University of Birmingham.

References

Adams, D. (2011). Everyday experiences of the modern city: remembering the post‐war reconstruction of Birmingham. Planning Perspectives, 26(2), 237-260.

Adams, D., & Larkham, P. (2019). The Everyday Experiences of Reconstruction and Regeneration: From Vision to Reality in Birmingham and Coventry: Routledge.

Aïtcin, P. C., & Minders, S. (2011). Sustainability of Concrete. Abdingdon, Spon.

Allen, C., & Blandy, S. (2004). Fables of the reconstruction: Inner-urban regeneration, city centre living and the reinvention of urban space. Paper presented at the international conference of the International Sociological Association, Research Committee.

Mecanoo architecten (2014). A People’s Palace: the Library of Birmingham. Berlin: Aedes Architecture Forum.

Barber, A., & Hall, S. (2008). Birmingham: whose urban renaissance? Regeneration as a response to economic restructuring. Policy studies, 29(3), 281-292.

Batty, M. (2007). The creative destruction of cities. Environment & Planning B, 24, 2-5.

BBC. (2008). Bullring ‘UK’s ugliest building. Retrieved from http://bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7668994.stm

Benton-Short, L., Keeley, M., & Rowland, J. (2019). Green infrastructure, green space, and sustainable urbanism: geography’s important role. Urban Geography, 40(3), 330-351.

Birmingham City Council (1989). The Highbury Initiative City Challenge Symposium. Birmingham: City Council.

Birmingham City Council (2017) Birmingham Plan 2031. Birmingham: City Council.

Bryson, J. (2003) Reshaping and reinvesnting the city of Birmingham: planning for enterprise and the information society. In A. MacLaren (ed.) Making Sopace: Property development and Urban Planning London: Arnold.

Calder, B. (2016). Raw concrete: the beauty of brutalism: Random House.

Clawley, A. (2011). John Madin. London: RIBA Publications.

Clement, A. (2018). Brutalism: post-war British architecture: The Crowood Press.

Conzen, M.R.G. (1962). The plan analysis of an English city centre. In K. Norborg (ed.) Proceedings of the I.G.U. Symposium in Urban Geography, Lund, 1960. Lund Studies in Geography. Lund: Royal University of Lund, Department of Geography.

Dale, P. (2009). Experts cast doubt on Birmingham Central Library ‘concrete cancer’ claims. Birmingham Post 16 June. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/ (accessed 6/9/2019).

Edensor, T. (2019). The haunting presence of commemorative statues. Ephemera, 19(1), 53-76.

Flynn, N., & Taylor, A. (1986). Inside the rust belt: an analysis of the decline of the West Midlands economy. 1: International and national economic conditions. Environment & Planning A, 18(7), 865-900.

Foster, A. (2005). Birmingham: Yale University Press.

Glendinning, M. (2013). The conservation movement: a history of architectural preservation: antiquity to modernity: Routledge.

Gold, J. R. (2007). The practice of modernism: modern architects and urban transformation, 1954–1972: Routledge.

Graham, B., Ashworth, G., & Tunbridge, J. (2000). A Geography of Heritage. London: Edward Arnold.

Hall, T., & Hubbard, P. (2014). ” Birmingham needs you/you need Birmingham”: cities as actors, actors in cities. In M. Conzen & P.J. Larkham (eds), Shapers of Urban Form: Explorations in Morphological Agency (pp. 285-300). Abingdon: Routledge.

Harwood, E. (2015). Space, Hope, and Brutalism: English Architecture, 1945-1975: Yale University Press.

Hopkins, O. (2017). Lost Futures: The Disappearing Architecture of Post-war Britain: Royal Academy of Arts.

Kynaston, D. (2015, 10 October). A crushing case for brutalism — with the people left out. The Spectator. Retrieved from https://www.spectator.co.uk/2015/10/big-is-beautiful-a-crushing-case-for-brutalism-with-the-people-left-out

Larkham, P.J. (2016). Replanning post-war Birmingham. Architectura, 46(1), 2-26.

Larkham, P.J., & Adams, D. (2016). The un-necessary monument? The origins, impact and potential conservation of Birmingham Central Library. Transactions of the Ancient Monuments Society, 60, 94-127.

Larkham, P.J. (1996). Conservation and the City: Routledge.

Larkham, P.J.(1999). Tensions in managing the suburbs: conservation versus change. Area, 31(4), 359-371.

Lees, L. (2003). Visions of “urban renaissance”: the Urban Task Force report and the Urban White Paper. In R. I. M. Raco (Ed.), Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy. (pp. 61-82). Bristol: Policy Press.

Loftman, P., & Nevin, B. (2003). Prestige projects, city centre restructuring and social exclusion: taking the long-term. view. In M. Miles & T. Hall (eds) Urban Futures. London: Routledge.

Madin, J. (2009, 9 October). Cutting the cultural and civic heart out of Birmingham. Birmingham Post. Retrieved from http://www.BirminghamPost.net/comment

Manzoni, H.J. (1968). The Development of Town Planning in Birmingham. Unpublished notes from the History of Birmingham Seminar no. 2, School of History, University of Birmingham, copy in Birmingham Library, Local Studies, LP56.4.

Martin, G. H. (1968). The town as palimpsest. In H. J. Dyos (Ed.), The Study of Urban History. London: Edward Arnold.

Mecanoo architecten (2014). A People’s Palace: the Library of Birmingham. Berlin: Aedes Architecture Forum.

Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government (2018). Revised National Planning Policy Framework. London: Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government

O’Neill, R.V., DeAngelis, D.L., Wade, J.B. and Allen, T.F.H. (1986). A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Parker, D., & Long, P. (2004). 'The mistakes of the past'? Visual narratives of urban decline and regeneration. Visual Culture in Britain, 5(1), 37-58.

Sirman, B. M. (2018). Concrete Changes: Architecture, Politics, and the Design of Boston City Hall: University of Massachusetts Press.

Sutcliffe, A., & Smith, R. (1974). Birmingham 1939-1970:(History of Birmingham Volume III): Oxford University Press.

Sutcliffe, A. R. (1967-9). Transcripts of Interviews with Prominent Birmingham People 1967-9. Unpublished typescript, copy in Birmingham Library, Local Studies, LF71.

Thomas, A., Lombardi, D. R., Hunt, D., & Gaterell, M. (2009). Estimating carbon dioxide emissions for aggregate use. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability.

Tibbalds, Colbourne, Karski, Williams (1990). Birmingham Urban Design Strategy: City Centre Design Strategy. Birmingham: City Council.

Urban Task Force (1999). Towards an Urban Renaissance. London: Department for Environment, Transport and the Regions.

Van Nes, A. (2001). Road building and urban change. Paper presented at the Space Syntax 3rd International Symposium Proceedings, 2001.

While, A. (2006). Modernism vs urban renaissance: Negotiating post-war heritage in English city centres. Urban Studies, 43(13), 2399-2419.

While, A. (2007). The state and the controversial demands of cultural built heritage: the origins and evolution of post-war listing in England. Environment & Planning B, 34, 645-663.

While, A., & Short, M. (2011). Place narratives and heritage management: the modernist legacy in Manchester. Area, 43(1), 4-13.

Downloads

Published

26-12-2019

How to Cite

Larkham, P., & Adams, D. (2019). Persistence, inertia, adaptation and life cycle: applying urban morphological ideas to conceptualise sustainable city-centre change. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.15320//ICONARP.2019.78

Issue

Vol. 7 (2019): SPECIAL ISSUE "URBAN MORPHOLOGY"

Section

UM

License

COPYRIGHT POLICY 

1. The International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDeriatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license lets the author to share (copy and redistribute) his/her article in any medium or format.

2. ICONARP cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms:

The author must give appropriate credit, provide a link to ICONARP, and indicate if changes were made on the article. The author may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the ICONARP endorses the author or his/her use.

The author may not use the article for commercial purposes.

If the author remix, transform, or build upon the article, s/he may not distribute the modified material.

The author may share print or electronic copies of the Article with colleagues. 

The author may use the Article within his/her employer’s institution or company for educational or research purposes, including use in course packs. 

3. The author authorizes the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) to exclusively publish online his/her Article, and to post his/her biography at the end of the article, and to use the articles. 

4. The author agrees to the International Journal of Architecture and Planning (ICONARP) using any images from the Article on the cover of the Journal, and in any marketing material. 

5. As the author, copyright in the Article remains in his/her name. 

6. All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal.