Assessment of Seismic Behaviour and Safety of a Masonry Heritage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.99

Keywords:

Historical, heritage structure, minaret, seismic, masonry, performance

Abstract

Turkey is a highly seismic country where numerous major earthquakes have devastated or damaged the existing historic structures owing to there is a large number of historical structures, mostly religious ones like mosques, and churches. The minarets are essential parts of mosques and there are many of these historic structures across the country which were built since Seljuq Empire started to rule the Anatolia and followed by Ottomans. As Turkey located in a highly active seismic zone, the possible damage of the minarets, the tallest part of the mosques, should be examined and the safety measures, in terms of seismic retrofit, should be considered. It is engineering communities’ responsibility to satisfy the longevity of these existing heritages by the help of science and knowledge.     

To realize this objective, a case study is planned which addresses the problem of seismic capacity of a stone masonry minaret as a part of the architectural heritage in Istanbul, and a typical historical mosque is chosen. Mathematical model of the minaret is prepared in order to obtain possible deformation profile, lateral displacements, free vibration modes and most likely failure modes under seismic excitation by using response spectrum analysis.

Most recent developments in the in-situ testing of structures and computational procedures for structural analysis have made reaching to the important results about the behaviour of the old masonry structures. The numerical results have shown that the greatest damage accumulated near the shoe region and the lower part of the shaft. The evaluation of these results is promising in terms of seismic safety of these heritages with minimized intervention on the structure without compromising the authentic view and function.  

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Ahmet Murat Türk, Civil Engineering Department in Istanbul Kultur University, İstanbul / Turkey E-mail: muratturk52@gmail.com

Ahmet Murat TURK, graduated from Bogazici University, Department of Civil Engineering in 1991. He received M.Sc. degree in 1994 and Ph.D degree in Structural Engineering from Bogazici University. He had worked as Post-Doctoral Research Associate at School of Civil Engineering of Purdue University between 1999 and 2000. Currently, Dr. Turk is holding the position of Associate Professor of Civil Engineering in Istanbul Kultur University.

References

Ahunbay, Z. (1988). Mimar Sinan Yapılarında Kullanılan Yapım Teknikleri ve Malzeme. In, Mimarbaşı Kocasinan Yaşadığı Çağ ve Eserleri I, (pp. 531-538), Istanbul, Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.

ANSYS. (2018). “Academic Research Mechanical”, Release 17.2.0, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Arıoğlu, N., Arıoğlu, E. (1997). “Mimar Sinan’ın Sectiği Taş: Küfeki ve Çekme Dayanımı”, Paper presented at the 14. Türkiye İnşaat Mühendisliği Teknik Kongresi, İzmir. Turkey.

Arıoğlu, E., Arıoğlu, N. (1999). “Mimar Sinan’ın Taşıyıcı Olarak Kullandığı Küfeki Taşının Mühendislik Gizemi”, Paper presented at the Mimar Sinan Dönemi Yapı Etkinlikleri Semineri, İstanbul, Turkey.

Batur, A. (1994). 1894 Yazı Pek Heyecanlı Geçmişti, Bir Depremin Yüzyıl Dönümü“. İstanbul Dergisi, 10, 25-32.

Erguvanlı, K., Ahunbay, Z. (1989). Mimar Sinan'ın Istanbul’daki Eserlerinde Kullandığı Taşlarin Mühendislik Jeolojisi ve Mimari Ozellikleri. Mühendislik Jeolojisi Bülteni, 11, 109-114.

Eurocode 8 (1998). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance.

Lourenco, P.B. (2006). Recommendations for Restoration of Ancient Buildings and the Survival of a Masonry Chimney. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 239-251.

Lourenco, P.B., Oliveira, D.V., Roca, P., Orduna, A. (2005). Dry Joint Stone Masonry Walls Subjected to In-Plane Combined Loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(11), 1665-1673.

Micelli, F., Cascardi, A. (2020) Structural assessment and seismic analysis of a 14th century masonry tower. Engineering Failure Analysis, 107, 104198.

NEHRP (2003). Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, FEMA 450-1/2003 Edition.

Oğuzmert, M. (2002). Yığma Minarelerin Dinamik Davranışı, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.

Oliveira, C.S., Cakti, E., Stengel, D., Branco, M. (2011). Minaret behaviour under earthquake loading: The case of historical Istanbul. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(1), 19-39.

Tarihi Yapılar İçin Deprem Risklerinin Yönetimi Kılavuzu (2017). Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü, Istanbul.

TBDY 2019 (2109). Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği, İçişleri Bakanlığı, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Ankara.

Turk, A.M., Cosgun, C. (2012). Seismic Behaviour and Retrofit of Historic Masonry Minaret, Gradevinar, 64(1), 39-45.

Turk, A.M. (2013). Seismic Response Analysis of Masonry Minaret and Possible Strengthening by Fiber Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) Materials. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 2013, Article ID 952497.

Valente, M., Milani, G. (2019) Advanced Numerical Insights into Failure Analysis and Strengthening of Monumental Masonry Churches Under Seismic Actions. Engineering Failure Analysis, 103, 410-430.

Venice Statue. (1964). International charter for the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites (the Venice Charter 1964).

(URL 1) https://www.diyanethaber.com.tr/diyanet-haber/son-dakika-istanbul-da-minare-yikildi--h7533.html

(URL 2) New integrated knowledge based approaches to the protection of cultural heritage from earthquake-induced risk. http://www.niker.eu/.

(URL 3) AFAD, İçişleri Bakanlığı, Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/TDTH/main.xhtml

(URL 4) SHARE-EU. http://www.share-eu.org, European Seismic Hazard Maps.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2019

How to Cite

Türk, A. M. (2019). Assessment of Seismic Behaviour and Safety of a Masonry Heritage. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7(2), 592–607. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.99

Issue

Section

Articles