Ahmet Salih Günaydın, Murat Yücekaya



Campus areas should be designed as centers where social activities can be fulfilled to meet students' needs, and which can serve the society by promoting sustainability. Nowadays, transportation systems (bike path, public transport, etc.) that support sustainability are not very common in campus areas. This situation leads to many environmental, economic and social problems. Therefore, it is extremely important to develop sustainable transport plans to uncover the current state of the transport system and to meet future transport needs.  In the study, it was aimed to compare the spatial characteristics of Kilis 7 Aralik University's current situation and its design in line with sustainable transportation principles.


This study was carried out in the central campus of Kilis 7 Aralik University. In the study, the existing transportation infrastructure of the campus has been evaluated, a sustainable transportation model has been formed in accordance with the concept of "green campus," and changes in spatial characteristics of the campus with the environmental, physical and social contributions of this model have been explained. Spatial composition method was used to analyze the spatial properties.


In the sustainable design model, while the local integration value decreased, global integration, intelligibility, accessibility, and synergy values were found to increase.

Research Limitations/Implications

In the study, the sustainable transportation model was carried out in a narrow area, such as the campus area. It is thought that the results obtained will be the basis for the studies to be carried out in larger areas.

Practical Implications

Campus accessibility, intelligibility and global integration values have increased with the sustainable transportation model. This situation is expected to increase the livability of campus areas.

Social Implications

It is thought that the mental health and academic achievements of the campus users will be positively affected in the campuses designed with the planning approach based on the sustainable transportation model.


The article is considered important in terms of examining sustainable transportation in campus areas compared to spatial analysis.


Green campus, Kilis 7 Aralık University (KIYU), space syntax, sustainability

Full Text:



Al_Sayed, K., Turner, A., & Hanna, S. (2012). Generative structures in cities. 8070:1-8070:18.

Amr, A. I., Kamel, S., Gohary, G. E., & Hamhaber, J. (2016). “Water as an ecological factor for a sustainable campus landscape”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 181–193.

Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., & Istek, C. (2001). Characterization of the street networks in the traditional Turkish urban form. 21.

Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2000). “Indicators of sustainable development for industry”, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4): 243–261.

Balsas, C. J. L. (2003). “Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses”, Transport Policy, 10(1): 35–49.

Berger, J. B., & Braxton, J. M. (1998). “Revising Tinto’s Interactionalist Theory Of Student Departure Through Theory Elaboration: Examining the Role of Organizational Attributes in the Persistence Process”, Research in Higher Education, 39(2): 103–119.

Dalton, N. S. C. (2010). Synergy, Intelligibility and Revelation in Neighbourhood Places [PhD, University College London].

Dalton, R. C., & Dalton, N. S. (2007). Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs. Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs. Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, İstanbul.

Demiroğlu, D., Günaydın, A. S., Yücekaya, M., & Çoban, A. (2018). Building Sustainable Transportation Model in University Campuses: Kilis 7 Aralık University. 705–715.

Dettlaff, W. (2014). Space syntax analysis – methodology of understanding the space. Ph.D. Interdisciplinary Journal, 283–291.

Dyson, R., & Renk, K. (2006). “Freshmen adaptation to university life: Depressive symptoms, stress, and coping”, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(10), 1231–1244.

Gann, D. W. (2003). Spatial integration: A space syntax analysis of the villages of the Homol’ovi Cluster [PhD, The University of Arizona].

Gu, Y., Wang, H., Robinson, Z. P., Wang, X., Wu, J., Li, X., Xu, J., & Li, F. (2018). “Environmental footprint assessment of green campus from a food-water-energy nexus perspective”, Energy Procedia, 152, 240–246.

Günerhan, S. A. (2016). Türkiye İçin Sürdürülebilir Üniversite Modeli. 5.

Hillier, B, Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). “Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1): 29–66.

Hillier, B. (1998). “A Note on the Intuiting of From: Thre Issuen in the Theory of Desing”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Desing Anniversary Issue, 37–40.

Hillier, B. (1999). “The Hidden Geometry of Deformed Grids: Or, Why Space Syntax Works, When it Looks as Though it Shouldn’t”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(2): 169–191.

Hillier, B. (2001). A theory of the city as object: Or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Presented at: 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. May 2001. 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Hillier, B. (2005). “The art of place and the science of space”, World Architecture, 18: 96–102.

Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Space Syntax.

Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1987). “Creating Life: Or, Does Architecture Determine Anything?”, Arch. 8 Comport./Arch. Behav., 3(3): 233–250.

Hillier, B., Hanson, J., Peponis, J., Hudson, J., & Burdett, R. (1983). “Space syntax, a different urban perspective”, Architects Journal, 178: 47–63.

Hillier, B., & Iida, S. (2005). Network and Psychological Effects in Urban Movement. In A. G. Cohn & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial Information Theory (Vol. 3693, pp. 475–490). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Hipp, J. A., Gulwadi, G. B., Alves, S., & Sequeira, S. (2016). “The Relationship Between Perceived Greenness and Perceived Restorativeness of University Campuses and Student-Reported Quality of Life”, Environment and Behavior, 48(10): 1292–1308.

IAU. (1993). Kyoto Declaration on Sustainable Development.

Jeong, S. K., Lee, T. H., & Ban, Y. U. (2015). Characteristics of spatial configurations in Pyongyang, North Korea. Habitat International, 47, 148–157.

Klarqvist, B. (1993). A space syntax glossary (Vol. 6). NA.

Kubat, A. S. (2015). Kentlerin Biçimsel Yapısımdaki Sayısal Mantık: Space Syntax. 32–58.

Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). “Environment and Crime in the Inner City: Does Vegetation Reduce Crime?”, Environment and Behavior, 33(3): 343–367.

Legeby, A. (2013). Patterns of co-presence: Spatial configuration and social segregation. Architecture and the Built Environment, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.

Li, Y., Xiao, L., Ye, Y., Xu, W., & Law, A. (2016). Understanding tourist space at a historic site through space syntax analysis: The case of Gulangyu, China. Tourism Management, 52: 30–43.

Litman, T., & Burwell, D. (2006). “Issues in sustainable transportation”, International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 6(4).

Lounsbury, J. W., & DeNeui, D. (1996). “Collegiate psychological sense of community in relation to size of college/university and extroversion”, Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4): 381–394.<381::AID-JCOP7>3.0.CO;2-X

Lukman, R., Tiwary, A., & Azapagic, A. (2009). “Towards greening a university campus: The case of the University of Maribor, Slovenia”, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(11): 639–644.

Miller, T. R., Muñoz‐Erickson, T., & Redman, C. L. (2011). “Transforming knowledge for sustainability: Towards adaptive academic institutions”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(2): 177–192.

Mohamad, Z. F., Kadir, S. N. A., Nasaruddin, A., Sakai, N., Mohamed Zuki, F., Hussein, H., Sulaiman, A. H., & Mohd Salleh, M. S. A. (2018). “Heartware as a driver for campus sustainability: Insights from an action-oriented exploratory case study”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1086–1096.

Oktaya, S. Ö., & Küçükyağcı, P. Ö. (2015). Üniversite Kampüslerinde Sürdürülebilir Tasarım Sürecinin İrdelenmesi. Examination of Sustainable Design Process In University Campuses. 8.

Olszak, E. (2012). “Composite indicators for a sustainable campus—Design rationale and methodology: The case of the Catholic Institute of Lille”, Ecological Indicators, 23, 573–577.

Özbil, A., Özer, Ö., & Kubat, A. S. (2013). “Sultanahmet Meydanı’nda hareket ve algı esaslı kentsel tasarım analizi”, Mimarlık, 371. /index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=385&RecID=3158

Özer, Ö., & Sema, A. (2014). Walkability: Perceived and measured qualities in action. 17.

Park, H. T. (2009). Boundary Effects on the Intelligibility and Predictability of Spatial Systems. 86.

Patel, B., & Patel, P. (2012). Sustainable campus of Claris lifesciences through green initiatives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 4901–4907.

Roberts, J., & Styron, R. (2010). “Student satisfaction and persistence: Factors vital to student retention”, Research in Higher Education Journal, 6(1): 18.

Rodwell, D. (2003). “Sustainability and the Holistic Approach to the Conservation of Historic Cities”, Journal of Architectural Conservation, 9(1): 58–73.

Sayed, K. A., Hillier, B., Penn, A., & Turner, A. (2014). Space Syntax Methodology.

Schiller, P. L., Bruun, E., & Kenworthy, J. R. (2010). An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation (1 edition). Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Tan, H., Chen, S., Shi, Q., & Wang, L. (2014). “Development of green campus in China”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 646–653.

Topçu, M. (2019). “Morphological Structures of Historical Turkish Cities”, Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 7(Special Issue ‘Urban Morphology’): 212–229.

Ugalde, C., Rigatti, D., Zampieri, F., & Braga, A. (2009). Intelligibility in Large Spatial Systems The Case of Porto Alegre Metropolitan Region. Ref, 119: 1–13.

ULSF. (n.d.). Retrieved 16 January 2019, from

UN-HABİTAT. (2008). State of the World’s Cities 2008/2009 Harmonious Cities. Earthscan.

Washington-Ottombre, C., Washington, G. L., & Newman, J. (2018). “Campus sustainability in the US: Environmental management and social change since 1970”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 196: 564–575. .1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.012

Wey, W.-M., & Huang, J.-Y. (2018). “Urban sustainable transportation planning strategies for livable City’s quality of life”, Habitat International, 82, 9–27.

Zhang, L., Chiaradia, A., & Zhuang, Y. (2013). In the intelligibility maze of space syntax– a space syntax analysis of toy models, mazes and labyrinths. 19.


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                                                                                     INDEXES & DATABASES:

                            ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by Selcuk University ©2020