Seismic Design Considerations for Architectural Design Aspects

Serra Zerrin Korkmaz

Abstract


Architectural design decisions play an important role in the earthquake behavior of buildings. However, architects are very unfamiliar with earthquake response concept. Earthquake resistant design (ERD) initiates generally during the architectural design stage to adhere to these principles. This study was focused on plan geometries, architectural design and structural system configurations for structural earthquake responses. A general-purpose finite element program was used to evaluate several irregularities and their corresponding earthquake responses. In the first phase of the study, the projections in plan view and projection ratios were compared from a torsional response perspective. In the second phase, nonparallel axes are investigated. In the last phase, the effects of shear wall arrangement on torsional irregularity response were analysed by considering 4 different configurations in a school building failure during the recent earthquake (2011) in the city, Van located in the east of Turkey. The number of storys was chosen as a parameter for the latter phase. The mode superposition method was preferred for the linear dynamic analyses. According to the results of the study, the torsional rotation was found to be proportional to the projection ratio in plan. For non-orthogonal cases, structure with an inclined axis more than 30°, torsional irregularity factor exceeded the code-defined limit. Beneficial observations and conclusions were drawn for both architects and structural engineers’ perspective.


Keywords


Earthquake, irregularity, architectural design, earthquake code, torsion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambrose, J., & Vergun, D. (1999). Design for Earthquakes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Ambrose, J. E., & Vergun, D. (1985). Seismic Design of Buildings. New York John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Anonymous. (2000). Earthquake Final Determinations, Special Publication. Retrieved from Bayindirlik Mudurlugu Turkey:

Arnold, C. (1996). Architectural aspects of seismic resistant design. Paper presented at the Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Mexico.

Arnold, C., Reitherman, R., & Whitaker, D. (1981). Building Configuration And Seismic Design: The Architecture Of Earthquake Resistance NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N, 82.

Arslan, M. H., & Korkmaz, H. H. (2007). What is to be learned from damage and failure of reinforced concrete structures during recent earthquakes in Turkey? Engineering Failure Analysis, 14(1), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.01.0 03

Arslan, M. H., Korkmaz, H. H., & Gulay, F. G. (2006). Damage And Failure Pattern Of Prefabricated Structures After Major Earthquakes In Turkey And Shortfalls Of The Turkish Earthquake Code. Engineering Failure Analysis, 13(4), 537-557. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.02.006

Dowrick, D. J. (2009). Earthquake Resistant Design and Risk Reduction, 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.

Duggal, S. K. (2007). Earthquake Resistant Design Of Structures. UK: Oxford University Press.

FEMA-356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. In. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Gülay, F. G., & Çalım, G. (2003). A Comparative Study of Torsionally Unbalanced Multi-Storey Structures under Seismic Loading Turkish Journal Of Engineering And Environmental Sciences(27), 11-20.

Inan, T., & Korkmaz, K. (2011). Evaluation Of Structural Irregularities Based On Architectural Design Considerations In Turkey. Structural Survey, 29(4), 303-319.

Inan, T., Korkmaz, K., & Çağatay, İ. H. (2012). An Investigation On Plan Geometries Of Rc Buildings: With Or Without Projections In Plan. Computers and Concrete, 9(6), 439-455.

Inel, M., Ozmen, H. B., & Bilgin, H. (2008). Re-Evaluation Of Building Damage During Recent Earthquakes In Turkey. Engineering Structures, 30(2), 412-427. doi:10.1016/ j.engstruct. 2007.04.012

Korkmaz, S. Z. (2015). Observations on the Van Earthquake and Structural Failures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 29(1), 0401403301-0401403325. doi:10.1061/ (ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000456

Korkmaz, S. Z., & Korkmaz, H. H. (2013, 8-12 September, 2013). Seismic Design Considerations About Architectural Design Aspects And Irregularities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (ASEM13), Jeju, Korea.

Mendi, H. E. (2005). Evaluation Of Architectural Consciousness And Exploration Of Architecture-Based Issues In Seismic Design. (Master Dissertation), Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Munshi, J. A., & Ghosh, S. K. (1998). Analyses Of Seismic Performance Of A Code Designed Reinforced Concrete Building. Engineering Structures, 20(7), 608-616.

Ozmen, C., & Unay, A. İ. (2007). Commonly Encountered Seismic Design Faults Due To The Architectural Design Of Residential Buildings In Turkey. Building and Environment, 42(3), 1406-1416. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2 005.09.029

Sezen, H., Elwood, K. J., Whittaker, A., & Mosalam, K. (2003). Performance Of Reinforced Concrete Buildings During The August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Earthquake, And Seismic Design And Construction Practise In Turkey. Engineering Structures, 25(1), 103-114. doi:10.1016/S01 41-0296(02)00121-9

TBEC. (2018). Turkish Building Earthquake Code. In. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry Of Public Works and Settlement.

Tezcan, S. S., & Alhan, C. (2001). Parametric Analysis Of Irregular Structures Under Seismic Loading According To The New Turkish Earthquake Code. Engineering Structures, 23(6), 600-609. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00084-5

TS500. (2000). Turkish Standard-Requirements For Design And Construction Of Reinforced Concrete Structures In. Ankara: Türk Standardlari Enstitüsü

Wakabayashi, M. (1986). Design Of Earthquake-Resistant Buildings. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Webpage. (2011). Primary school in Gedikbulak Village, after failure. Retrieved from https://fotogaleri.ntvmsnbc.com/ helikopterden-deprem-alani.htlm?position=37, 29 October 2011

Webpage. (2012). Gedikbulak village primary school. Retrieved from http://okulweb.meb.gov.tr, 19 December 2012.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.98

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                                                                                    
                                                                                     INDEXES & DATABASES:
                                                                                                      
 
                         
                      
                       
 
 

                                                
                            ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by Selcuk University ©2020