Disability and Otherization: Readings on Cinema in the Light of UD Principles

Havva Alkan Bala, İlkay Dinç Uyaroğlu

Abstract


Cinema and architecture are universal with their inclusiveness in the mental process. The mental process is often generated by the sense of sight in modern times. In this sense, cinema, as a visual art, has started to take an active role in the intellectual, conceptual and creative actions of modern man. With the cinema, the realities of the virtual world have become more convincing than the dreams of the real world. It involves person-environment relationships which might not be ours but “look like ours”. Universal Design (UD) also puts forward a proactive interaction in-between man and environment. UD is based on equitable, flexible, intuitive, perceptible, tolerant-to-error access with appropriate size and space. While its conceptual basis with its guidelines are commonly constructed on the spatial needs of people with disabilities, it highlights disability does not focus on only permanent, visible, bodily or intellectual (dis)abilities. Every kind of "otherization" creates disability in society. This study aims to investigate how the relationship between architecture and disability in cinema is portrayed by reading through films that are masterpieces covering experiences of different disability groups. Using Visual Analysis method in the study, the codes and categories generated based on the UD Principles are associated with selected visual images and dialogues according to the frames of meaning of the scenes in the films. In this way, this study aims to question the location of UD parameters in physical and social environment through cinema.

 


Keywords


Cinema, disability, otherization, physical environment, universal design

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alkan Bala, H. (2016). “Kifayetli Engelliler Ve Engelli Yetkinler”, II. Ulusal Engellileştirilenler Sempozyumu, 7-8-9 April 2016, Konya, Turkey.

Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring Disability: A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.

Collier, J. and Collier, M. (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

Çakmak Yılmaz, B. 2006, Engellilerin Sosyal Hayata Katılmasında Fiziksel ÇevreDüzenlemelerinin Rolü, ÖZ-VERİ Dergisi (T.C.Başbakanlık Özürlüler İdaresiBaşkanlığı Hakemli-Süreli yayın) ISSN: 1304-8082 syf:863-879, Ankara.

Demerath, N. J. III. (1981). “Through a Double- Crossed Eye: Sociology and the Movies”, Teaching Sociology, 9 (1): 69-82.

Dinç Uyaroğlu, İ. (2010). “Design Preferences of People with Visual Disabilities in an Urban District of Ankara, Turkey”, pp. 257-262 in 1st international Graduate Symposium on the Built Environment, edited by S. T. Elias-Ozkan; B. Z. Çakmaklı; F. Summers. Ankara: METU Faculty of Architecture.

Dinç Uyaroğlu, İ. (2017). “Accessibility and Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in University Campus Spaces”, Arts and Design Studies, 50: 14-22.

Dowd, J. J. (1999). “Waiting for Louis Prima: On the Possibility of a Sociology of Film”, Teaching Sociology, 27 (4): 324-342.

Dwoskin, S. (1997). “Whose Film?”, pp. 214-217 in Framed Interrogating Disability in the Media, edited by A. Pointon and C. Davies. London: BFE Publishing.

Göregenli, M. (2018). Çevre Psikolojisi: İnsan Mekan İlişkileri. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Hargis, C. H., Gickling, E. E., and Mahmoud C. C. (1975). “The Effectiveness of TV in Teaching Sight Words to Students with Learning Disabilities”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8 (1): 37-39.

Imrie R. (2004). “Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home”, Housing Studies, 19(5): 745-763.

Imrie, R. (2012). “Universalism, universal design, equitable access to the built environment”, Disability & Rehabilitation, 34(10): 873-882.

Imrie, R. and Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. London: Spon Press.

Iwarsson, S. and Ståhl, A. (2003). “Accessibility, usability and universal design--positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships”, Disability Rehabilitation, 25(2): 57-66.

Karpf, A. (1997). “Crippling Images”, pp. 79-84 in Framed Interrogating Disability in the Media, edited by A. Pointon, C.

Davies. London: BFE Publishing.

Keller, C. E., Hallahan D. P., McShane, E. A., Crowley, E. P., and Blandford, B. J. (1990). “The Coverage of Persons with Disabilities in American Newspapers”, The Journal of Special Education, 24(3): 271-282.

Kennedy, H. (2009). “Going the Extra Mile: Emotional and Commercial Imperatives in New Media Work”, Convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 15(2): 177-196.

Meşhur Alkan F. (2013). “Accessibility For People With

Disabilities In Urban Spaces: A Case Study of Ankara, Turkey,” Archnet-IJAR, Volume 7 - Issue 2 - July 2013 - (43-60)

Morris, J. (1997). “A Feminist Perspective”, pp. 21-31 in Framed Interrogating Disability in the Media, edited by A. Pointon, C. Davies. London: BFE Publishing.

Oliver, M. (1996). Understanding Disability from Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan Press.

Ostroff, E. (2011). “Universal Design: An Evolving Paradigm”, pp. 1.3-1.11 in Universal Design Handbook, edited by W. Preise and K. Smith. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Pallasmaa, J. (2005). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. Chichester: Wiley-Academy.

Pointon, A. (1997). “Disability and Documentary”, pp. 84-93 in Framed Interrogating Disability in the Media, edited by A. Pointon and C. Davies. London: BFE Publishing.

Polat, Ç. S. (2011). “Engelli Bireylere İlişkin Kültürel Tanımlamaların Başka Dilde Aşk Filmi Üzerinden İncelenmesi”, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.

Reichman, J. and Healey, W. C. (1983). “Learning Disabilities and Conductive Hearing Loss Involving Otitis Media”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16 (5): 272-278.

Safran, S. P. (1998). “The First Century of Disability Portrayal in Film: An Analysis of the Literature”, The Journal of Special Education, 31(4): 467- 479.

Salmen, J. (2011). “U.S. Accessibility Codes and Standards: Challenges for Universal Design”, pp. 6.1-6.7 in Universal Design Handbook, edited by W. Preise and K. Smith. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Saltoğlu, S. and Aydin Öksüz, A. (2016). “Bir İktidar ve İdeoloji Sorunu Olarak Mimaride “Engel” Kavramı”, II. Ulusal Engellileştirilenler Sempozyumu, 7-8-9 April, pp. 154-164, Konya, Turkey.

Salvesen, K. Å. and Undheim, J. O. (1994). “Screening for Learning Disabilities with Teacher Rating Scales”, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(1): 60-66.

Story, M. F. (2011). “Principles of Universal Design", pp. 4.3-4.12 in Universal Design Handbook, edited by W. Preise and K. Smith. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Taggart, L., McMillan, R. and Lawson A. (2008). “Women with and without Intellectual Disability and Psychiatric Disorders: An Examination of the Literature”, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3): 191-211.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.51

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

                                                                                    
                                                                                     INDEXES & DATABASES:
                                                                                                      
 
                  
                 
                
 
                   
 

                                                
                            ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning is an OAJ supported by Selcuk University, ©2018,